Until now Web 2.0 was on trains and flights, but they’ve recently turned to bus booking online. The Web 2.0 works on three G’s i.e., Go – Get – Gain which help people obtain three Cs i.e., Comfort – Class – Convenience. Bus booking online is set to boost its business, as the key mobility enabler, the bus, is perfectly complement other transport modes by taking commuters or travellers to their final destination.
The term Web 2.0 was a more complicated axiom for everyone. People would think if it had any sense or just a meaningless techno-mojos? But it acquires a Alphafysiotherapie Cesar therapie magnificent meaning. The phrase “Web 2.0” means using the web as a platform to perform different sorts of things using a web-based application.
3.6% people in India are active internet users. Most users access it through their office account. Of them 37% are personal account, 53% owing office account and others are only 10%. In developing countries like India, where public investment in bus transport infrastructure and private vehicle ownership is low, although busses are the only motorised lifeline for all.
The bus transport is an integral part of our social fabric and of different communities in India. It is lifeline to work, education, healthcare, leisure, and, of course, tourism. Busses ensure inclusive sustainable mobility for all citizens and visitors in the countryside and urban areas alike.
Modern busses and coaches offer customised services to meet demands of all kinds of commuters, travellers, tourists and event organisers. Busses are very adaptable. They are the most flexible of all group passengers transport mode. Buses pick them from their front door with no waiting time.
The Web 2.0 will have to focus on efficient public transport. It will prop up a greater use of safe, user-friendly, energy-efficient, flexible yet affordable transport modes. The busses guarantee the sustainable mobility of everyone, everywhere in India. The Web 2.0 upholds your cause, and in this way boosts bus ticket booking online.
I am an associate editor at KSRTC that provides online bus tickets and latest travel offers of customers.
This paper will examine the phenomenon of close relationship infidelity through the lens of evolutionary psychology. While personality predictors of infidelity are relatively more idiosyncratic, such that there are many personality characteristics that predict infidelity and no two people that are likely to commit infidelity have to necessarily have the same combination of personality traits. The evolutionary psychology theory speaks in terms of broad human tendencies that explain population trends. This paper will examine these theoretical tendencies, and suggest that based on the evolutionary theoretical framework of infidelity, men, at any point in time, will find more women acceptable for sexual relations. Furthermore, by applying basic human exchange behaviour to the previous claim, this paper will argue that men find each potential alternative mate to be less valuable than women find each of their potential alternative mates. In order to present a clear picture, key concepts will be explained first (Parental Investment Model, availability of alternatives, perceived susceptibility to infidelity (PSI)), along with evidence for those concepts. Finally, all the concepts and evidence will be pulled together to support the two hypotheses.